Editor’s Note: There are many ‘sane’ and fully ‘compos mentis ’human beings who believe that Hollywood is owned by the Elites, who intentionally gives us’ Truth Drops’ through Film and TV, because Evil must announce its intentions and in plain sight, albeit through deceptive means. Their ‘Truth Drops,’ do not have to be obvious and they can appear in ‘abstract’ form, nevertheless they do have to be in plain sight.
Following on from Red Brick’s first article in its ‘Hollywood Truth Drops’ series written by our resident TV and Film Reporter, Rory Branman, who examined the film ‘Trading Places,’ we have once again asked Rory to put the Hollywood Film Industry under the microscope. This time, we have asked him to investigate the Hollywood film, ‘Three Days of the Condor’ (1975). We thank our subscriber, Uyana Wyfeda for this excellent suggestion. OK Rory, let your fingers do the talking.
The film starred Robert Redford as the lead character. His Codename was Condor’ and he worked for the CIA as a reader/researcher. His role, along with other colleagues, was to look for ‘hidden’ terrorist plots in recently published books in all languages or journals from around the world.
Condor discovers in a book, a plan for the West to invade the oil fields of the Middle East and as per usual, he submits another routine report. One morning he pops out of the office on the coffee run and upon his return, Condor finds that all his colleagues are dead, having been murdered in what was clearly a ‘professional hit.’
Whilst Condor is on the run and seeking the truth, he enters a building looking for documents only to find himself confronted by a ‘hitman’ whom he believes is going to kill him, however, it turns out the Hitman has already despatched his target and informs Condor he has not been authorised to kill him. The Hitman, played by Max Von Sydow, does give him some advice.
He explains to Condor that if the CIA hitmen do not get him soon, then he will be contacted by his most trusted friend and colleague, who will tell him he has been authorised to ‘bring him in from the cold’ for his own safety, although the real intention will be to kill him.
Condor is eventually contacted by the ‘friend’ whom he agrees to meet outside the Washington Post Newspaper Building. It quickly becomes apparent to Condor that the hitman’s advice was correct, and he refuses to go with his friend. Before leaving, Condor asks his friend what was so special about the report he had recently submitted re the Middle East Oilfields, after-all, he had submitted many similar reports on all sorts of matters? His friend explained it was “because the plan would have worked.” Condor had unwrapped a CIA plot which was thought to be undecipherable without the keycodes. The plot was known only to a few people, and it was decided by them it was going to stay that way.
His friend explains the CIA will get him eventually and as he does so, Condor averts his gaze towards the Washington Post Building, to which his friend asks, “You haven’t.” Condor explains he has told the Washington Post everything. His friend asks, “What makes you sure that they will print it?” Condor replies, “They’ll print it.” The film ends with an expectation that Condor will be killed, although the question of ‘will they or wont they’ print his story, is left for the audience to ponder over.
On 2nd of August 1990 President Saddam Hussain ordered the invasion of Kuwait over a dispute concerning oil. In an address to the US Congress, President, ‘Daddy Bush,’ said the following concerning Iraq’s invasion of Kuwait on the 1990: “The crisis in the Persian Gulf, as grave as it is, also offers a rare opportunity to move toward an historic period of cooperation. Out of these troubled times, our fifth objective — a New World Order — can emerge.”
On 16th January 1991, President Bush senior, announced to the nation, that the start of the Persian Gulf War had begun, under an allied coalition of military forces, codename, Operation Desert Storm. Yes, Kuwait would be liberated, however, take a look at the ‘Outcomes’ for the Coalition, or should that be ‘Co-Expedition?’ The USA have been on their ‘Middle Eastern Tour’ ever since: Kuwait, Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Iraq (again) and finally Syria, sort of.
Do the words of Daddy Bush ‘ring a bell’ and have a home in our now everyday language? They should sound familiar, shouldn’t they ‘Mr Klaus Schwab?’
If the words do not sound familiar to you, or you have not heard of Mr Schwab, then you are either beyond hope, in a permanent coma, or your name is ‘Rip Van Winkle!’
In conclusion, it is clear there are parallels with the book Condor read, and how 15 years later Iraq’s invasion of Kuwait did give rise to the USA and others getting a foothold in the Middle East and its oil fields.
So, do I think this is a Hollywood Truth Drop, well, I’m not sure, because I would have to know if Saddam Hussain invaded Kuwait believing that he was in control of events? Or was he deceived and coerced into the invasion; unaware this was all part of a much bigger, sinister plot?
I doubt whether any of us will ever get to know what ‘triggered’ Saddam Hussain to invade Kuwait, because he must have known he was on to a loser, and it would provide some in the West the excuse they have been looking for to head on over into Iraq and check the place out.
If Saddam did fall for a deception, then it was ‘the mother of all deceptions,’ and he certainly fell for it, hook, line and sinker, and the rest, as they say, is History.
Rory Branman, for Red Brick Truth.
What do you think?