Editor: This article is written by Red Brick’s Lead Political Reporter for the United Kingdom, Rusty Retton, whose latest book is ‘Killing Britain’s Green & Pleasant Land,’ which documents the erosion of freedoms and traditions the British citizens have long since enjoyed.
It also discusses the tyrannical autocratic direction the UK Government is heading by ‘kettling’ its citizens towards AGENDA 30 including 15 Minute cities.
The book will soon be released and with so many pre-orders a second edition already has the printing presses rolling. Take it away Rusty.
Cheers Ed and hello folks. In my many years of reporting on UK politics, it would be fair to say that I have never seen anything quite like this. I am of course referring to when the UK’s Prime Minister met up with the President of the United States, Donald J Trump or to his MAGA following: ‘The Donald.’
President Trump raised a few eyebrows when he answered journalists questions which, if they weren’t, could not have been more cleverly scripted to highlight how low the relationship between the UK Government and its citizens has sunk. With this in mind we have prepared several memes including the actual questions asked by the media, and the answers given in response to those questions by the Donald and….wotsizname.
The meeting was held at a Golf Resort owned by the Donald, in Turnberry, Scotland on 28th of July 2025 during his five day visit to the land of the ‘forty-fivers’ and ‘fried mars bars,’ and if this meeting was not intended for Trump to give ,,,,err,,,,wotsizname a dressing down, actually, not a dressing down but to humiliate ‘wotsizname,’ then the ‘Donald’ could not have done a better job even if it had been planned by his political strategists.
Whether the Donald was intending to ‘big up’ his image in the UK or to the rest of the world for that matter, after all, the Donald has taking a bit of a ‘shellacking’ recently over the ‘Epstein files,’ then he was certainly on safe ground ‘taking a pop’ at the Prime Minister of the UK, wotsizname.
NOTE: Because we are an international organisation that uses parody, humour and satirical licence to report the news, expect to see our ‘DNA’ all over the following images, based on their meeting:
It was as informative to watch as it was deeply worrying, sickening even, to see the UK PM squirm as he announced that in the UK ‘free speech’ ruled supreme?!’ So why did I describe President Trump’s meeting with ‘wotsizname’ as informative, worrying and then sickening, well, read on.
Informative because wotsizname appeared politically impotent when sitting alongside the Donald, whose presence singularly overwhelmed the Leader of the UK Government, which gave rise to the thought that, is wotsizname actually in charge of anything given that he sat there like a schoolboy waiting to see his headmaster for a telling off.
At Red Brick we have for a long time wondered who is ‘wotsizname’ and what are his ‘core values,’ because let’s face it, he bangs on enough about the UK values telling us that ‘tolerance’ and ‘diversity’ is the UK’s strength, both of which are under fire from the British citizens whose concerns are many, not least of all is their fear of expressing an honestly held opinion and or belief, which could land them in hot water for ‘wrong speak.’
So, who is ‘wotsizname’ and more importantly, who is he working for in earnest, actually, who do any of them sitting in government work for, what with their ‘other’ jobs, consultancies as well as any ‘perks’ they might receive from rubbing shoulders with the lobbyists? Is this why the UK Government is introducing ‘dystopian measures’ to silence and punish its citizens who are asking more and more questions of their government than at any other time I can remember. Answers on a postcard, please.
Worrying, because I believe the Online Harms Bill is only the ‘tip of the iceberg,’ just another stepping stone in a long line of measures that have been introduced to further fetter the UK population, who are already living in an ambiguous system designed to confuse and stifle speech arising out of ‘alternative’ ideas, opinions and honest academic debate, especially concerning government policies and genuine concern over the direction their country is heading.
Sickening, because whilst the meeting between the Donald and wotsizname raised a chuckle or two around the world, should we really be seeing humour in what is for us citizens of the UK a dark tragedy playing out in real time, and it is the UK’s citizens children whose futures will be determined in the ‘final act; I’m sure my concerns will be shared by many of the UK’s citizens, in fact, I wouldn’t be surprised if the amount of UK citizens who share or have similar concerns, adds up to a total looking more like a telephone number including the area code.
So, what is offensive other than the obvious such as inciting violence and or hate intending to cause harm towards another, but even then the ‘free speech absolutists’ might consider this acceptable, however, this is not a grey area for law enforcement.
Well, herein lies the problem with so many permutations as to what may or may not be offensive and to whom, especially when an opinion or its words might offend a person, a person who might not have been present at the time the words were spoken, or even repeated; they only have to hear it via a third party to be offended.
Let us take the current Labour Government for example where the buck stops with the Prime Minister, who just over a year ago assured the voters that if they gave him [Labour Party] their vote, he would in return fulfil and make good his party’s promises and or pledges, however, it is not going too well or perhaps not at all, and we have four more years to witness what the government has in store for us citizens, which they likely knew before the General Election last year, but ‘forgot’ to tell us….yeah, right?!
The following is an article you might find interesting, which begs the question: Who or what is it that holds politicians, political leaders and their party’s to account when they renegue, backtrack, ignore, abandon etc., the promises and pledges they made to the British Electorate, which induced the citizens to vote them into government, only to watch the same promises and pledges go up in smoke once they are in government? .
Well, I would have once said an ‘Apolitical Media,’ but that ship sailed a long, long time ago and most likely run aground soon after leaving dry dock, because, in my opinion, there has been a betrayal of the ‘special freedoms’ awarded to many of the Mainstream Media organisations, whose independence has been swallowed up by the globalists and the corporates, each with their own agenda.
So, the reporters who were intended to hold the government and institutions to account, as well as exposing the wrongdoings and corruption by individuals, especially with those in positions of public trust, might find that their investigations go unrewarded and are destined to the ‘pending tray’ where they will remain, because the ‘story’ was not in the long-term interests of another.
An example of the above would be the obvious rise of those who believe there is so much news bias reported in the MSM, so much so that once proud News Organisations have now become synonymous with the phrase: ‘Fake News,’ although Mark Twain might have used the phrase ‘Lies, damned lies, and statistics,” which is attributed to him, although it might well have originated much earlier.
‘Hey Google – What does being ‘apolitical’ mean?
‘Apoliticism is apathy or antipathy towards all political affiliations. A person may be described as apolitical if they are uninterested or uninvolved in politics. Being apolitical can also refer to situations in which people take an unbiased position in regard to political matters.’
https://www.google.com/search?client=opera&q=apolitical+press&sourceid=opera&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8
With the above in mind it goes without saying, although I will say it anyways, I am deeply offended by the actions of this government and despite the fact that this government is failing to keep its promises, there is no recourse no matter how offended I might be, other than to be told that I will have to vote the current government out at the next General Election.
Of course, this is a mockery, a regurgitation of what we are told when we have, in good faith, voted a party into government, only to watch on as they go the same way as previous governments with their broken promises etc, etc, bla-dee-bla! Clearly, what we are subject to is a mockery or should I say, Dem-ockery.
However, if one of us repeats one of the quotes from a Viz Comic albeit a historical one or a one from a current issue, which can be purchased just about anywhere and some ‘snowflake’ is offended by it, then its curtains for you.
OK, see what I did there, of course you did, I deliberately used the word snowflake to highlight how even the use of this word to describe a person’s reaction to, what in my world is ‘water off a duck’s back,’ is, in their world, an arrow through their heart; perhaps it would be better to say a person of ‘reasonable firmness,’ but then again someone, somewhere, will be offended.
It would be fair to say that generally speaking, this country, the UK has become a shadow of the world I grew up in, a world I would have without doubt in an instance chosen for the children of the next generation, so is it any wonder why so many UK citizens are choosing not to have children, although the bigger picture is far more complex than this, such as parents not wanting to have their children growing up in an atmosphere of fear where every word or action can, or will be, interpreted as a sign of their prejudice or hate towards a particular person or group.
Trump Puts wotsizname on ‘Notice’ during their meeting:
Trump ‘Criticises’ the Labour Party’s Treasury and its ‘Pickpocketing’ of the UK Farmers Family Inheritance:
Clearly, it was humiliation and a not too subtly one at that. If there is a message here for wotsizname, then it could not have been clearer or more obvious that, the Donald does not hold him in too high a regard, but if I was to speculate further on this meeting between the two of them I would say that, in my opinion, it was all about lining Nigel Farage up to be the next PM of the UK, or at least, the Donald showing his overwhelming support for his good friend, Nigel.
In fact, I would go so far as to suggest that the biggest humiliation of all was that ‘wotsizname,’ whether he knew it at the time or not, took part in what looked to me more like a party-political broadcast on behalf of the Reform Party than a meeting of two heads of state, and so often as the saying goes in ‘Clown World UK,’ you could not make this stuff up!
And if you were wondering if the Donald did in the end get his sausages, Red Brick reporter was on hand to capture this ‘happy snap.’
Rusty Retton for the Red Brick International News Group.
- Bob ‘the Gob’ will be back with more on the meeting between the UK PM and the Donald in an article titled: ‘Whose Your Daddy.’