The Doctors Trial
Nuremberg Code 5: ‘No experiment should be conducted where there is an a ‘priori reason’ to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects.’
Foreword: This is an opinion piece, and nothing has been introduced to deliberately mislead the reader. Although some may not share the views within this article, at Red Brick we acknowledge that we are all living in unprecedented times, where it seems, on occasion, that our United Kingdom Government speaks with ‘forked tongue,’ changing the COVID rules as often as the ‘Father Time weathervane’ at the famous Lord’s Cricket Ground changes direction with the wind.
Never before have we seen such a world-wide push by global leaders to what many believe is an experimental liquid (COVID Vaccine) into the veins of their populous. We also read of the division within the medical community, and what can only be described as the birth of tyrannical regimes, such as Australia and New Zealand and all in the name of COVID.
Red Brick for Truth investigator, ‘Rusty Retton,’ has taken a closer look at today’s current information and the events surrounding COVID. We have asked Rusty to look back into our past history for any parallels with what is happening today. Rusty’s article reflects this, so, let us all ‘stand easy’ and listen in to Rusty’s brief:
We are living in a world where even our own doctors must be struggling to keep up with the pace of change, because if they were keeping pace, do you really believe they would promote an arguably ‘experimental ‘vaccine,’ which is being rolled out under an ‘emergency law,’ and in terms of its efficacy, where are the lists of medical papers outlining the many independent studies proving it is safe, or as safe as can be for its international roll-out??
The psychological campaign being conducted by, and or on behalf of our One-Party State stands on the graves of the fallen; the brave men and women the world over, who fought to keep us free from one of the very evils that is being allowed to embed itself within our world: Medical Apartheid.
At the end of WW2, a broad spectrum of Nazi medical personnel was hanged for war crimes following their fair trials, something of which they did not afford to their victims. So that the horrific crimes and human experiments should never happen again, the good guys involved in the prosecution and judgement at the trials went further than trusting the ‘free press’ to hold governments and their tyranny to account, hence, they gifted humanity a legacy: The Nuremberg Codes, also referred to as the Nuremberg Protocols.
The Codes are a set of rules drawn up to protect humanity, not only in times of war, but also during peacetime, too. The Codes are to ensure that any medical experiments are conducted both morally and ethically by the medical profession. Despite these not being prosecutable as stand-alone charges, any breach of the Codes can be used as evidence in a prosecution under laws specifically designed to deal with ‘Crimes Against Humanity.
A modern-day example to help explain the above would be to use the UK Highway Code (HC) as an example, because breaches of the HC ‘rules are not stand-alone offences, but any breach of the rules can be introduced into evidence to prove an offence has been committed as is alleged, for example: Careless or Dangerous Driving.
On the website Famous Trials https://famous-trials.com you will find many works by Professor Douglas O. Linder, whom we thank for the following extract from his work , which summarises the ‘Doctor Trials.’
Following the Second World War twenty-three German physicians went on trial for War Crimes:
- Count I – The Common Design or Conspiracy.
- Count II – War Crimes.
- Count III – Crimes Against Humanity.
- Count IV – Membership in a Criminal Organization.
The trial considered the fate of those who either:
- Participated in the Nazi program to euthanize persons deemed “unworthy of life” (the mentally ill, mentally retarded, or physically disabled), or
- Who conducted experiments on concentration camp prisoners without their consent.
The Doctors Trials lasted 140 days. Eighty-five witnesses testified and almost 1,500 documents were introduced. Sixteen of the doctors charged were found guilty. Seven were executed. Professor Douglas O. Linder.
The book ‘Doctors from Hell’ written by Vivien Spitz, provides a chilling account of the experiments performed on human subjects by the Nazi doctors, primarily concentration camp inmates. Vivien Spitz book describes in detail a description of the research in the pursuit of their ‘twisted’ aims. The book also contains previously unpublished photographs and documents used during the Nuremberg trials.
This next link will take you to an article written by our very own reporter, Sol ‘The Wise’ Manin,’ who reviewed the printed work entitled ‘Life Unworthy of Life,’ written by two German professors, Karl Binding, a Jurist, (a person with expert knowledge of law) and, Alfred Hoche, a psychiatrist. Many believe this book to have been the ‘Nazi Playbook for the Holocaust.’ The parallels within this book are frighteningly in line with Nazi Doctrine of that time. https://theredbrick.co.uk/lifeunworthyoflifepart2/
The UK and other world governments, based on what I would expect to have been ‘expert advice’, appear to me and many others, to be waiving the established Medical Ethics and Nuremberg Protocols in the name of the ‘Pandemic Emergency,’ allowing Big Pharma to produce a rushed (emergency) vaccine without the longevity associated with ‘field testing, efficacy studies and human trials etc, which can take many, many years, before being authorised for its medical use and ’human consumption’, and distribution to the general population.
The UK government has told its people that it has confidence in the efficacy of the vaccines, despite the vaccines having been developed in super-fast time and receiving emergency authorisation. It is understandable that people question whether the vaccines have received thorough testing and analysis, before being let loose on the population, especially when their governments seem determined to ‘jab’ all citizens. Make no bones about it, it certainly does look like they want to inject everyone: Pregnant women, children, people of all ages regardless of disability and other long-term, if not life-long illnesses.
There are dark parallels to be drawn between the psychological tactics used by the German Propaganda Machine on their own people, and what the Mainstream Media claims to be ‘ethical’ news reporting.
Many years before WW2, the German people turned on the German Jewish population, people with whom they had lived and worked alongside without discord. The German citizens (not all), who were not Jewish themselves, were turned against their Jewish neighbours, by their government, along with the state-controlled media in a cold and calculated campaign of propaganda, to indoctrinate the ‘indigenous’ Germans to despise the Jewish community, claiming that the Jewish people were to blame for the dilapidated and financial predicament Germany was in, which as we all know was a load of shite and it was Germany itself to blame.
In the UK we are seeing people who choose not to have the jab, as yet or not at all, being labelled as the ‘Unvaxxed’ and because of this they are going to be responsible for, to what has manifested itself in the mind of the ‘jabbed,’ a ‘Biblical Pestilence’ leading to the end of the world itself; all of this despite the ‘jabbed’ having had more pricks (jabs) than a lady of easy virtue, or for that matter a man of a similar disposition, just to be inclusive, of course.
We have already witnessed efforts to make the Unvaxxed wear yellow halyards to identify themselves, to make them stand out, often being refused access into communal venues or eat alongside vaccinated people. The Mainstream Media (MSM) relentlessly 24/7 ‘loop’ us with their new ‘word toys,’ calling those who have not had the jab as ‘Antivaxxers,’ despite many ‘unjabbed’ people having been given syringe immunisations from birth, ‘but not experimental ones.’
I have heard that many senior medical practitioners and health care professionals want to know the results of the ‘jabs’ efficacy, as a result of ‘thorough trials,’ before committing to its vaccine. Yet, the government and the MSM refer to those who have not as yet or will never have the ‘jab’ as ‘Anti-Vaxxers,’ which is of course a lie and is deliberately designed propaganda to ‘stir up resentment,’ cause division and turn people against each other, and if it is not this, then what is it designed to do, build community cohesion?
Take a look around you and see the disdain building up around those who wear their masks everywhere, and those who exercise their ‘freedom of medical choice’ not to, although many who embrace this freedom fear that it will be a short-lived one, now that the ‘Flu Season’ is upon us, and by the way, where is the flu, did it fly away? I have heard the ‘Maskers’ even wear them when they are sitting on the potty having a ‘dump,’ although oddly enough this might be a good thing.
Are the parallels between the German Nazis and to a much lesser degree, the propaganda we are having to listen to and watch on our televisions, written on posters or billboards, at the entrance to shops, restaurants, health spas and gyms etc. pressurising men, women and children to have a ‘vaccine,’ a vaccine still in its infancy, which I believe is very worrying. It will not stop here, and there will be more pressure applied on those who have not been jabbed.
You think this sounds unlikely, then wait until those who have exercised their lawful right to not have the ‘jab’ at this time, are standing in separate bus queues waiting for their ‘special bus,’ wearing their government issued yellow lanyards, which if history continues to repeat itself will remain yellow and mandatory to wear.
Who knows what ‘floaters’ make up the contents within the ‘jab,’ and not the ones reported in the MSM, I mean the ones we do not get to find out about, because under the patency laws this is a grey area, in the same way certain carbonated drinks have their unique recipes protected.
Many who will not have the ‘jab’ in this life or the next fear ‘what lies within’ the contents that make up the ‘jab,‘ the fear being that there are microscopic ‘chemical commandos’ lying dormant within its darkened deep recesses, which one day will be triggered to attack their ‘immune systems’ and it’s ‘Goodnight Vienna.’
Finally, to the ‘elected’ governments who claim to represent us, us being the good everyday people who have trusted you in the hope that one day you will come good and revoke the law that exempts the pharmaceutical industry from being accountable for any deaths, believed or proven to have been caused by the ‘jab.’
We must never forget the evils that millions of people were subjected to during World War Two, and the laws, rules, codes etc that were made to prevent such suffering or persecution ever happening again.
Finally, I will say this on behalf of Humanity, what price was your soul that coerced you into supporting a law to be passed, which exempts the pharmaceutical industries from being accountable for their vaccines, should they result in death or injury.
Rusty Retton, Red Brick for Truth.