Tory - Make England Great Again
Fresh clean air would be a great start!
Editor: This article is written by Toni ‘Ginge’ Wand, a Solar Energy Expert and our resident Geoengineering Investigator. A warm Red Brick welcome for Ginge Wand.
Make England Great Again, isn’t that what the Conservative Deputy Chairman, Lee Anderson, said to the Guardian when outlining the Tory 10-Point-Plan to Make England Great Again, which sounds more like ‘jingoistic porn’ for the masses, so ask yourself why is he using this language?
One reason for this could be it is all part of the Tory’s build up to the next election, a way of rallying the parties voters to support their Members of Parliament by appealing to their sense of dare I say it, Empire, in the hope that it will, to put it bluntly, keep the MP’s on the Swampminster ‘gravy train.’
Could the words used by Mr Anderson have been a deliberate attempt to ‘warm up’ the public feeling, to bring back that ‘Proud to be British’ nationalistic fervour and to promote within the public’s consciousness a ‘Dunkirk Spirit,’ so that it will soften imminent news that NATO is officially on a war footing with Russia.
When I say NATO it includes Europe, and when I say Europe I mean the United Kingdom, and when I say the United Kingdom I mean, you, me, us, everyone. If my opinion is way off the mark, good, great, even brilliant, but if it is in some small way near the mark, then this type of language used may have been prepared for the 10-Point-Plan, carefully selected language by experts in psychology and or civilian overpaid consultants, who are already halfway up the ladder for a new year honour, possibly.
If Britain ever was great, it was never in my lifetime, well, not that I can remember, anyways; perhaps it is because I am getting older in years, or is the constant Chemtrailing I witness almost every day casseroling my grey cells with its elements, elements more at home on the periodic table, instead of in the air that I breathe.
The image coming up is from an internet search for images under the title: ‘Chemtrails.’
https://www.google.com/search?q=chemtrails/
According to the ‘fact checkers,’ these types of images are ‘condensation trails.’ The trails were left by aeroplanes tootling about in the sky. It looks like the pilots were using laughing gas instead of oxygen, because of the childlike ‘Etch-a-Sketch’ patterns in the sky.
Whatever our government permits us to have showered down upon us from the white unmarked jets that release the chemicals through stratospheric injections, which turns our God given blue skies white and as such cause the blocking out of the sun; could this be the cause of my memory fog?
There is another possibility, it could be the lack of vitamin D from the sun being unable to assist my metabolism to ‘do its thing,’ by promoting the health of my immune system, because vitamin D is an essential requirement of this.
This is happening all over the world, the Chemtrails are there to be seen in the background of the Mainstream Media (MSM) broadcasts, whether the broadcast is live or recorded, and even many up-to-date outdoor daytime recordings made by the public, but do not take my word for it, just tilt your head back ever so slightly and see for yourself.
The architects of these Chemtrails are no longer trying to hide this fact, heck. they even make illuminati triangles and big X marks in the sky, which must be to mark the spot, or to define some other evil symbolism known only to those who authorise the Chemtrailing.
Returning to making England ‘great again,’ why don’t we start with nature, because is it just me or has anyone else noticed if there is a distinct lack of insects in their gardens, especially the wild bees. During summer 2022 I saw only one ladybird in my garden, when I would normally see them in abundance.
Then there are the wild birds which have slowly been disappearing from view, and it has been several years since I last saw greenfinches, siskins and the woodpeckers gorging themselves on my seed feeders, much to the annoyance of the spuggies and blue tits.
However, do not take my word for it, just take a look at your car windscreen after you have had a drive in the countryside, I am sure you will see that the ‘insect roadkill,’ you would have once seen on the windscreen, the headlights and grill, is no longer present and what is the reason for this, apart from the globalist ‘go to’ narrative, climate change of course (canned laughter).
It is all there and in plain sight because the Chemtrailing jets fly low enough for us all to see the trails being sprayed from the cannisters attached to the aircraft’s wings.
In the interest of transparency, here is an article from yet another fact checker, ‘The Week’s website, which I thought would be interesting to see what conclusions their ‘fact checking’ article arrived at re the ‘alleged’ existence of Chemtrails (scary laughing, thunder and lightning flashes).
Welcome to, ‘The Week,’ which has the phrase, ‘All you need to know about everything that matters,’ next to its title name, The Week. So, there you have it, no need to look any further than, ‘The Week.’
The article is written by Julia O’Driscoll date 4th May 2022. The title of the article is: The chemtrails conspiracy: What are the claims? Next to which is written: ‘Theorists believe governments, big businesses or the UN may be behind a large-scale secret plot.’
But we’re not going to do that, not for the moment anyway, because we are going to take a look inside ‘The Week,’ so please join me, as I go through the keyhole and conduct my own review of ‘The Week’s’ article.
The first thing I noted was that rather than state the claims of the people who are painted as, ‘Conspiracy Theorists,’ the article begins by being true to the phrase next to the name of the magazine: ‘All you need to know about everything that matters.’
So, how does the article begin, well, it begins with a narrative that I would have expected to read towards the end of an article as part of a summary or conclusion, having taken time to assess all the available evidence. Here is an extract from the beginning of the article:
‘In the right weather conditions, long lines of thin clouds trailing planes can be seen in the sky, sometimes long after an aircraft has disappeared from view.
The conspiracy theorists cashing in on YouTube’s algorithms
Study finds UK’s most popular conspiracy theory.
These clouds are contrails, and are the result of water vapour emitted from planes condensing in freezing temperatures, leaving behind “thin trails of ice crystals”, explained the Met Office.
But “ever since the US Air Force published a paper in 1996 about the hypothetical harnessing of weather for military objectives”, a “shadowy global aviation conspiracy” has spread among online communities, said National Geographic.’
OK everyone, stand down, because in only a few lines the conspirators have been shot down by the ‘big guns,’ whose names have been dropped: The Met Office, US Air Force and the National Geographic. It looks like it’s all over, we have been given their answer, now, be quiet and go home, all of you!
So then, should we just leave it there, because that is not the Bulldog Spirit is it Mr Anderson, oh, looks like he has gone, so perhaps this is a bit too ‘hush hush’ for public consumption, probably because we, ‘cannot handle the truth.’
Now that you have your opinion, you will not be surprised to know that The Week in published its conclusion under the title:
The evidence.
‘A paper published by Environmental Research Letters in 2016 collated 77 experts’ conclusions on evidence of a “secret, large-scale atmospheric program” (SLAP). The authors noted that public confusion or uncertainty about the chemtrail claims may have been in part due to the scientific community having not addressed these concerns rigorously for some years.’
The article finally ended under the paragraph heading: Going mainstream.
National Geographic describes the chemtrail theory as “a load of codswallop,” but it appears to have “gone mainstream” nonetheless. The 2016 study “did little to convince hardcore believers”, said the magazine, and believers “dismissed” evidence that the theory isn’t true by claiming it is “part of a massive cover-up”.
The BBC has attributed the proliferation of the chemtrails conspiracy theory to its resonance in certain digital communities. “Closed groups of like-minded people – the type common on social media and the internet – are one of the big reasons why conspiracy theories solidify online,” the broadcaster said.
“The conspiracy theorists won’t be swayed.”
I have to comment on the “secret, large-scale atmospheric program,” given the acronym, (SLAP). If this is not The Week using the title as a metaphor to let the ‘Truthing Community’ know where they are in the pecking order giving them a metaphorical ‘slapping down,’ or a ‘know your place’ telling off, because it certainly gave me that impression and also, a bloody good laugh, too. I mean, SLAP, seriously, you couldn’t make this stuff up.
It has not been my intention to disparage or be disrespectful about The Week or its article, or even the honestly held beliefs of those involved in the putting together of this article, but it does not go into enough detail to explain what I and others across the world are seeing on a day to day basis, and that is the X marks the spot shapes, illuminati triangles or pyramid shapes, formation of grid lines and the short wavy almost snake lines that have become a pre cursor to the beginning of a Chemtrailing session in earnest.
And I do not want to be flippant about this, but the image used for The Week’s article is that of an X being formed by an aircraft. I did read the link to the National Geographic’s article titled: Hot topic: should I worry about Chemtrails? The article was written by: James Draven and published on the 8th of April 2019 and updated on the 13th of September 2021.
Again, the National Geographic article did not offer, in my opinion, a satisfactory explanation as to what I and others are seeing almost every day in the skies above us, especially how the sun disappears for hours under the canopy the trails leave as they hang and expand giving us a white ceiling any international paint manufacturer would admire.
Imagine going into your local DIY Store and saying: “I was looking up at the beautiful blue sky today and thought to myself, I am going to paint my rooms the same colour as the azure of the sky, but by the time it took me to fetch my camera from my house to get a colour-match image, Chemtrails had formed a white canopy above my head, leaving me quite angry, but then I thought, ‘hold on,’ and now I would like you to colour-match this image of the ‘Chemtrail-Whiteness,’ because I have decided to paint my ceilings instead.”
One thing the National Geographic article does do, yawn-yawn, is label people who question the Chemtrail-Contrail narrative as far right when all they want is a credible explanation for what they witness etc.
So, when any media organisation declares a person who thinks critically as ‘far right,’ it is a put down and to me reads as, ‘go away you are annoying me, pleb.’
Oh yes, although I might have missed them, but what were the names of the experts and the organisations they belong to, and who funded them, but most notable of all for me was the lack of links to the case studies and published papers proving that the trails were condensation trails, and not Chemtrails as I and millions of others believe.
Perhaps I did not see the links in the National Geographic article because the ‘condensation trails’ are affecting my eyes, so it is not just the Chemtrails fogging my brain, it is the Contrails, too!!!
In Article Two I will be referencing the following internet site, which advocates that the Chemtrails I and others are witnessing, are indeed Chemtrails. Here is the website address should you not want to be left on tenterhooks until the next and final article.