100 Days

Editor: Today’s article is written by our Feelings, Facts and Nonsense researcher Ron ‘Shorty’ Wyndul.

Ron has released over ten books resulting from his specialist research subjects including:

• Millennials & Their Meltdowns.

• The Rise and Fall of the Male Breadwinner.

• A Bucket of Sand –The Ultimate Safe Space for Snowflakes.

• Today I Am A Non-Binary Pineapple & Tomorrow will be a 6-foot 6-inch Lumberjack.

And his most recent book:

• Pans, Trans & Gender Ideals.

Over to Ron, thanks Ron.

Hello to everyone, so let me start by writing:

The headline below is from an article written by Glen Owen on the 30th of June 2024 for the Mail Online. It was written days before the 4th of July General election, which saw the Labour Party enter No 10 Downing Street to take over the running of the United Kingdom (UK) Government from the Conservative Party.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13584071/Rishi-Sunak-voters-Labour-tax-migrants-Rwanda-Keir-Starmer.html

It was so long, farewell, auf Wiedersehen (NOT) goodbye to the publicly unelected Prime Minister (PM), Rishi Sunak, and “Oh, it’s you,” to the new PM, wotz-iz-name, yes, this is him, the one in the blue suit:

The article tells us how PM Sunak predicts the Labour Party, if elected, will wreck Britain in just 100 days?! A bit specific Mr Sunak, as if you know something we, the electorate could not have decided for ourselves with many of us have long since accepted that previous and successive governments stopped working for us a long time ago and more towards the interests of others.

So, why should we think it will be any different under the next party whose turn it is to take a ‘stab’ at government. After-all, was it not made clear to us, the ‘useless eating’ electorate in plain speech and in plain sight when Emily Maitlis asked the then Labour Party leader and future PM this question:

Click on the link below for the answer and there are no prizes for guessing.

Yes, DAVOS of course, the home of the unelected powerful elites who are unaccountable to the electorate, but more powerful than most governments. Watch the video via the link below and be informed, or at least, think critically.

https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=wef+2024

Anyways, back to the former publicly unelected PM, Mr Sunak and the article.

Given that we practically have a One-Party System of government, it was a bit rich for the then not ‘publicly elected’ prime minister, Mr Sunak, to sound so concerned and spout his warnings, because he practically threw his and his party’s electoral chances ‘under the bus’ when he failed to fully attend the 1944 D-Day beach Landings Remembrance Day held in France on 6th June this year, 2024.

The official international ceremony took place on Omaha Beach and was attended by twenty-five heads of state, veterans and public officials.

PM Sunak thought it was a better idea to ‘bimble’ off early and conduct media interviews thinking his disappearance from the D-D Remembrance event would go unnoticed….WRONG! Talk about giving the MSM and the Labour Party a ‘gift on a plate,’ so that they could rip him a ‘new one!’

The event was by invitation only, which for me exacerbated the PM’s early departure knowing that the families of the veterans alive today and the families of the fallen would have gladly attended in his place to show their respect, because if it was not for the actions of the few remaining living veterans and their fallen comrades, PM Sunak might never have been PM, let alone having the freedom to choose to leave the event early; kind of ironic don’t you think.

Still, such poor decision making was lambasted in the media both home and abroad, making what might have just been an own goal turn out to be a right ‘stinker of a performance,’ by conceding a penalty and then being sent off to complete an absolutely miserable outing.

The remorse

Talk about not ‘reading the room,’ because he certainly curled a ‘Mr Whippy’ over the memory of ‘the fallen heroes’ and ‘the few’ heroes who survived WW2 and are still with us today,’

I do not know if any of his family members fought for the United Kingdom during the two world wars, or in any other wars in the past, but it was ‘political suicide’ to not attend an event so endeared to the British public, the composition of which is so diverse when it comes to honouring the ‘memories of the fallen.’

This is evidence of a citizen’s perception and or an honest belief that the political and elitist classes who have sworn to serve the UK and its citizens, know extraordinarily little of the division between the citizens they represent and themselves.

The majority of us citizens have to spend our lives looking up, unlike the privileged few who, by comparison, live life at the top end looking down on us and no doubt will continue to do so for generations to come.

It is within this privileged group that the political classes exist, the very men and women we voted for, with whom we entrusted with our future and our family’s future, so that they would build a better safer Britain for us all.

Yet instead, what our politicians have ‘successfully’ achieved election after general election, was to vote to keep the United Kingdom and its voters in ‘perpetual war,’ through direct or indirect involvement including the provision of the ‘guns and bullets’ that ‘fuel’ war and all for a small fee, of course, which need not necessarily involve the exchange of money.

The money which has been exchanged could go to the British wartime veterans still with us today and help their ‘Winter Fuel Payments,’ after-all, it is little reward for the physical and mental scars that war beset upon them.

Therefore, I can think of no better summation of the gratitude the United Kingdom owes its veterans other than through the words widely attributed to the Korean War veteran Howard William Osterkamp:

“All gave some, some gave all.”

This is why it is important for us ‘ordinary,’ everyday people to always remember how our forebears fought in both World Wars believing that the fighting would end with them, so that their children might enjoy a peace that they and their forefathers were never allowed to, having been robbed of their youthful innocence in the very two world wars being remembered on this day.

Then PM Sunak must surely have realised that his decision to ‘bugger off’ early from the D-Day Event was going to end badly for him, or at least he should have. I am of the opinion that his closest advisors warned him of the consequences and if they did, did he then choose to ignore their advice and all of this with only days to go to a General Election.

This year’s electioneering was the limpest affair I have ever witnessed in my lifetime, I can only wonder if there are greater mechanisms at play here; it was almost as if the new PM’s election success was pre-ordained and everything before that was nothing more than a distraction, just plain and simple theatre, so least said about this tory boy and don’t get me started on the Rwanda meander.

However, could Mr Sunak be right in his 100 days prediction and if so, might his opinion have been based on any or all of the following:

• His own insightful analysis,

• A sneak preview of a globalist script.

• He handed over the baton to a DAVOS WEFSTER (wot-iz-name) just to see if the Great Reset is ‘real.’

• Orders from the World Economic Forum at DAVOS calling time on his tenure in furtherance of their Great Reset.

• He is a kind-hearted man who realised that his efforts to ‘Make Britain Great Again’ amounted to nothing more than ‘pishing in the wind,’ and his parting shot was to warn us that making Britain Great Again is not in the interests of those calling for a Great Reset.

• Or it was the parting words from a man who knew he was politically gooshed, resigned to heading home to lie in his heated

swimming pool far away from public view, indifferent to those who can hardly afford to boil an egg, let alone heat their swimming pool.

Who knows, it could be any one or all of these and now that he is out of sight and out of mind, he will have time to reflect.

Perhaps Mr Sunak might be thinking that in a few years’ time the ‘fickle’ voters will have forgotten all about him and his party’s previous tenure, and vote him and his party back into power, in the same way the voters failed to learn from the damage New Labour did to the United Kingdom from 1997-2010, by chancing their arm and again giving the Labour Party their ’hopium’ vote and returning them back into power in July 2024.

We will have to wait and see but if the first 30 days of the new PM’s tenure is anything to go by, then watch this space because Red Brick will revisit this subject and complete the second and final part of this article at the end of 2024.

It has been said that a week is a long time in politics and if you are not doing too well, then 100 days must be a sh*t storm.

Ron ‘Shorty’ Wyndul, Red Brick International News Media Group.

Red Brick.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *