Editor: Our resident investigator re all things that are cruel to animals is our Wildlife Animal Welfare Correspondent, Arlus Hibbs, who, if you did not already know is a fox who has been a victim, but now considers himself a survivor of animal cruelty, namely foxhunting.
Arlus now spends his time urging people to repeal all forms of bloodsport cruelty and to consider the damaging effect it has on all children, especially during the early stages of their development and with that, it is back to matters in hand and to welcome back Arlus for Article 2.
Like many young people of the time, I grew up watching the ‘Planet of the Apes’ films along with the television series never thinking for one moment it was real. Very few humans were killed although they were often chased, however, when they were killed it was theatrical and not graphic; I never had the real sense that someone was dead or that the death drew parallels to real life.
Now I am older and battle-hardened through the cruelty of humans, I have to wonder if man’s evil sins towards us animals will come back to bite them, literally, because one thing is certain, there are people out there who sit on the thrones of power and excite at the prospect of a global conflict, or at least an Inter-Europe one.
If there was a war, might its creators, planners, sponsors and fellow sociopaths miscalculate its outcome and be themselves subject of unintended consequences and not just us, the useless eaters and their intended targets
If something like this was ever to happen, it will be humans running around the ring and chased down by animals on horseback, however, a slight digression of sorts and now back on message.
Bullfighting, now there’s a joke in itself….bull….fighting, the satanic and diabolical systematic slow death of a helpless animal by humans sticking skin ripping sharpened steel into it whilst being cheered on by some of the lowest forms of humanity, people who delight in the destruction of life through inhumane means.
It’s time to call this evil out for what it is ….a ritualistic killing bordering on the satanic. Like so many rituals portrayed on the television and in movies, satanic rituals involve the killing of innocent animals and the spillage of their blood, which is lapped up by people cheering on and or chanting out some Satanic Hocus Pokus.
I wonder if the animal in the image above is wondering whatever it did to the world to deserve a drawn-out painful death and if it were, and people knew this, would the spectators above be bothered….like shite they would!
I’ll say one thing about satanists, at least they do not call it ‘sport,’ although take this in context as it is only a small and insignificant point, separating those who practice the ritual killing of animals and those who consider it sport.
Both the spectators and supporters of these cruel acts still walk in parallel with those who commit such satanic acts on animals, and are only separated through their definition of such cruelty and or their own gratification and beliefs, in my humble opinion of course.
I am really struggling to get my head around or to have an inkling of what is going on inside the heads of the adults when they see the first piercing of the bull’s skin, and how those feelings must intensify for them as further piercings of the bull’s skin are made by cruel bastards.
Despite the torturous punctures to the bull’s skin causing its blood to flow down the sides of its body landing droplets around its feet, it still struggles to survive, just like any human would do up until their last breath. The fear and sheer terror the bull must feel as it looks at the humans who might have once cared for it as it grew into adulthood.
Then there are the adults who take their children to bear witness to the destruction of an animal’s life through torture, knowing that their children have to watch on as the adults gleefully express their joy and delight at the bull’s demise, fuelled by their body’s release of endorphins giving them that instant climatic hit and or whatever it is that gratifies them.
We claim as a people to be civilised when in fact there are those amongst us who after thousands of years have remained, mentality wise at least, in situ further down the food chain along with their neanderthal ancestors, metaphorically speaking of course; although I could be doing our ancestors a disservice, because despite them living in caves their need for dietary sustenance must surely have not included torturing the animals before killing and filling their stomachs.
The few instances I have mentioned regarding this vile cruel activity are exactly that, a few examples surrounding this subject and the list is by no means an exhaustive one, but I cannot finish this article without raising the subject of what we have been told for decades now about the identification of psychopaths and sociopaths (Opaths).
These ‘Opaths’ whose ‘opathic’ traits can, apparently, be identified at an early age and with immediate interventions introduced into the child’s development, can counter their opathic traits and guide towards a full, healthy and happy life, which will prevent the children from progressing beyond hurting animals essentially heading them off ‘at the pass’ and hopefully, prevent them from torturing or murdering their fellow human beings.
Of course, this is only my opinion based on the AI information below, as well as the common sense I was born with, but my message is that if you do not want your child to grow up and become a Hannibal Lectuur or any of the following identified by Google AI, then why take a chance and subject your child to cruel ‘bloodsports.’
Following directly on from the above AI information I asked Google: What is the research showing that children who torture animals will become psychopaths?
AI Overview:
These are results for what is the research showing that children who tortured animals will become psychopaths:
‘While the link between childhood animal cruelty and adult psychopathy is a well-established area of research, studies do not show that children who torture animals will definitively become psychopaths. Instead, research points to a correlation, indicating that animal cruelty is a significant “red flag” for potential antisocial behavior and a symptom of underlying psychological distress.’
‘The relationship between animal cruelty and psychopathy was first popularized by the “Macdonald triad” in the 1960s, a theory that identified a set of three behaviours—fire setting, bedwetting, and animal cruelty—as predictors of future violent crime.’
‘However, this theory was simplistic and based on flawed methodology. Modern research offers a more nuanced view, summarized by two main hypotheses.’
- The deviance generalization hypothesis: ‘Cruelty to animals is one manifestation of a broader pattern of antisocial behavior, which may or may not escalate to violence against humans.’
- The graduation hypothesis: ‘Animal cruelty is a “training ground” that precedes and escalates to violence against humans. While some studies support this, it does not explain why many animal abusers do not become violent toward humans, nor why many violent criminals have no history of animal abuse.’
The strongest links to psychopathy: ‘‘The predictive strength of animal cruelty appears to be directly related to the perpetrator’s motives and the nature of the abuse.’
- Studies show that animal cruelty in childhood is most strongly associated with psychopathy when: ‘Accompanied by callous-unemotional (CU) traits: A lack of empathy and remorse is considered a precursor to psychopathy. Research has found that children who exhibit both animal cruelty and CU traits are on a more severe trajectory of antisocial behavior.’
- Characterized by sadistic motives: ‘Abusers who inflict harm for fun or pleasure are more likely to have sadistic tendencies, which are closely linked to psychopathy.’
- Recurrent and intentional: ‘Repeat offenses, especially involving methods like strangling, drowning, or burning, are stronger predictors of adult violence than isolated incidents or cases of neglect.’
- Common contributing factors: ‘Rather than being a direct cause of psychopathy, childhood animal cruelty is more often a symptom of other psychological and environmental issues.’
- A history of abuse or trauma: ‘Children who witness or experience domestic or family violence are significantly more likely to abuse animals. They may be modelling the aggression they have observed or acting out their own trauma.’
- Dysfunctional home environments: ‘Abuse or neglect can disrupt the healthy development of empathy and conscience, creating conditions where violence is normalized.’
- A lack of empathy: ‘Research has found a consistent link between low levels of empathy toward animals and a higher potential for abuse.’
- The importance of early intervention: ‘For most children who are cruel to animals, the behavior indicates underlying distress rather than a guaranteed path to psychopathy. Psychologists now focus on these acts as early warning signs that necessitate intervention.’
‘Early diagnosis and treatment can promote empathy development and provide support for children from abusive or chaotic home environments, preventing the escalation of violent behaviours.’
Thank you again to Google AI.
If you read the first article written by me, you will know that I referred to one of the many books I have authored. With this in mind and now taking into account the ‘warnings’ above, you might want to question why it is when your child asks you the following:
Strange innit, don’t you think, that in the opening paragraph of the AI explanation it includes the following line, ‘studies do not show that children who torture animals will definitively become psychopaths.’
So, if I am reading this correctly then the overall opinion is that it is OK to allow parents to take their children to watch bulls being tortured, which in turn will normalise them to such animal suffering, but that’s OK, because he MIGHT NOT turn out to be an evil sadist, however, why take the chance.
In view of this, Red Brick International Media News Group sub-contracted the FBI to send a special agent to speak with an expert at his private and highly secure residence in the ‘grand old’ USA to discuss the following: Is there a link between children being subjected to watching animals being tortured and developing socio and psycho opathy’s post childhood?
So, there you have it, absolute and conclusive proof and case closed, or it should be, well, at least enough for the lawmakers to stop cruel sports, ‘full stop!’
In my opinion parents who subject their children to their own lustful whims of hunting down animals to destruction and or other bloodsports such bullfighting, need to be ‘taken to task’ why they think this is appropriate.
I would go so far to suggest that those in authority who have sworn to protect children should seek to transcend the ‘abyssal’ values of parents who take their children to watch bloodsports and kill these events dead, dead, dead, through legislation and lawful enforcement.
However, there will always be those who will break the law to satisfy their sickness of hunting animals down to exhaustion and destruction, claiming this to be part of our heritage and its sporting traditions, therefore the transgressors should be proportionately punished.
M’mm, punishment, now there’s a thought, perhaps the transgressors should be hunted down by a skulk of foxes, unleashed until the transgressors are writhing about in the earth, terrified, awaiting their impending doom….m’mm….too much, a bit excessive even, well, not to a fox it won’t be, but we’ll leave that one on the backburner for now.
Nothing in this so-called bloodsport is sporting and whereas it might still be considered a tradition, the existence of these beliefs should only exist in the heads of those who would seek to continue its vile cruelty, and in their heads it should remain.
As for the traditional argument and all that heritage bollox, that is all based on the past and that’s where it should remain, in the past, because, in my opinion, ‘animal blood sports’ are only a kick in the arse off the ‘Hunger Games’ mentality, in my opinion.
Oh, you don’t think the ‘real’ sickos would enact the ‘hunger games’ if they thought they could get away with it, eh, well, you need to wake up and smell the roses if these articles are to be believed?
So, the fact that the people who do nothing yet have the legal authority to, in the stroke of a pen, withdraw the legalised killing of animals used in bloodsports or any other animals for that matter that are cruelly killed because a tradition and or culture demands it, well, does that not tell you something about the people who could, no, not could, but should act and yet they do nothing.
If what I say is correct along with the inaction of those in power who do nothing, then isn’t that a form of evil endorsement for the cruelty, after all, that is all that evil requires to exist within a society because, putting it simply, and I am referring to God’s rules here, by people’s ommission and failure to act or blindly turn away and do nothing, this is all the permission evil requires to do its bidding, all of which will be in plain sight of us all
Perhaps the overall lesson to be learned here is from the film series Planet of the Apes where the animals do in the end take over and control the human race, because one day what was a film script might just turn out to be a prophecy.
As a final thought ask yourself this, if we do not look after the animals, who will? Governments, politicians, law enforcement? I very much doubt it given their current form and the running does not look good for the future, at least politically, because the ‘lunatics are truly in charge and running the asylum.’
Arlus Hibbs, Journalist, Humanitarian and War Correspondent for the Red Brick International Media News Group.