At Red Brick, we do not believe in ‘Conspiracy Theories’ which are fine, if the definition of this was something like, ‘a state of conjecture, or surmise, where proof is lacking.’
The description, ‘a state of conjecture, or surmise, where proof is lacking,’ is a legal definition for the basis, or minimum standard, for what the Police (Old Bill), and other Legal Eagles call, ‘Reasonable Suspicion.’
You might think that the above was a definition of what a conspiracy Theory is, or should be, and we would agree with your assumption, but ‘reasonable suspicion’ is the lowest threshold the police must satisfy before arresting someone for a crime, which might never have occurred; all the police need is reasonable suspicion to suspect a crime has been committed, and have reasonable grounds for that suspicion, and that they reasonably suspect the person who was responsible for the crime.
Yet, a ‘Truther,’ or ‘Truthers,’ are people who only seek to find the answers, that will explain the facts, and not, to fit a perceived narrative of events. Often, the Truther will investigate heinous, criminal acts, where the explanation put forward by the investigators, does not explain the events in enough detail, or the explanation is identifiably incredulous.
So, should the legal phrase, ‘reasonable suspicion,’ also be the source of ridicule, along with titles: Conspiracy Theorist or Truther? Call it what you will, but some catastrophic events, and the subsequent explanation for them, put forward by investigators in their reports, do not always add up, for example:
The 9/11 Commission Report, compiled by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), an ‘independent’ organisation, who were appointed by the government to investigate the ‘chain of events,’ that caused the Twin Towers to be razed to the ground, in a never seen before ‘pancake’ destruction, which was, apparently, caused by two Jet Liners flying into them.
But it was not just the Twin Towers which collapsed that day, into their own footprint, no Sir, it was three Towers, yes, three, this is not a ‘typo,’ but it is a fact, and it did happen, and the Tower was called, ‘Building 7.’ Building 7, which, was surprisingly empty, was a government building in which high profile and complex investigations were being conducted, which Red Brick will discuss in another article.
The NIST Report, which would be published years after the attack on the Twin Towers and Building 7, would attribute the collapse of the Twins, to fires after the Jet Planes hit them, which caused structural weakening of the buildings and their subsequent collapse.
As for Building 7, the report claimed, that falling debris from the Towers hit the building, and this caused further fires within Building 7, which spread like a wildfire, thus weakening the structure.
Never has it been known for a fire to bring down a ‘skyscraper,’ yet, on 9/11, three fell to the ground on the same day, and within hours of each other, other than the obvious exceptions, which are those buildings that were prepared for a controlled demolition by professionals, over a period of weeks?!
There are those who continue to demand answers for 9/11, such as, the ‘Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth (AE). All three buildings have been the source of much, if not all, the investigations carried out by the ‘Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth.’
So, we are not talking about clueless doubters or dreamers, here. The doubters are not doing this to make money, in fact many of them were doing simply fine before and after 9/11, they are credible people whose lifestyles, experiences and qualifications transcend all backgrounds. They are people from countries all over the world who are demanding answers, because the 9/11 event was so sinister, it could happen anywhere in the world and not just the United States of America. Is it any surprise to know, that there are still legal cases to be heard twenty years after the collapse of the Towers?
People, globally, also want answers, and not just to a few questions, but all their questions, and not all of those put forward in the NIST Report, but answers to the many questions that were conveniently, according to some, omitted.
Credible answers are still being sought as to how two Jet Airliners can take the legs away from three buildings. However, do not just take our word for it, do some digging, we did. Here, you can start with the website for, ‘Architects and Engineers for 9/11.’
The search for 9/11 truth, is an absolute rabbit warren, in fact, it is the ‘mother of all rabbit warrens, with holes to frustrate you, throw you off the scent, mislead and lie to you, but eventually, if you do not stray from the path, the truth will find you!
Of course, the Mainstream Media do not like to talk about it much, although a female reporter for the BBC, did report during a live transmission, that Building Seven, the third Tower had also fallen, despite it still standing upright as clear as day in the background from where she was reporting from?
The reporter was right, though, because building seven did fall, several hours later, because it collapsed into its own footprint, just like the Twin Towers. This report is the result of the BBC’s ‘Predictive-Programming,’ so it is well worth your licence money to fund their ‘Department of Soothsayers,’ or is this just a conspiracy, too?
Red Brick will be taking its own peek a bit further down the ‘rabbit hole,’ but for the time being, we hope to satisfy your hunger for knowledge with a ‘snapshot’ of an insight and a starting point to do your own research, as well as feeding your hunger, with, ‘food for thought.’
Bon Appetite,
Red Brick