The Red Brick International Media News Group is NOT MONETIZED. All our employees work for nothing. One of our thousands of ‘work adages’ is: ‘Oi-Oi What’s All This Then?’
Editor: A big headline from the Independent, but is it a fair one? We will have a look at its content and give our opinion about whether we think it is a fair one or not, or even if it is a ‘nothing burger’ lacking in meaty content and or flavour, context, content or even if it is cheesy or not cheesy enough, anyways, let’s Bilderberger….no, not that, ‘build a metaphorical meaty burger’ out of this article and see if this daily staple from the Independent nourishes my interest, or leaves me running on empty.
We will not be commenting on Candace versus Macron’s ongoing situation directly, although we may refer to it in context with the Independent’s article.
Today’s article is written by Rona Francks, Red Brick Political Satirist and Comedy Critic, whose previous articles, ‘Germany Also Not At War With Russia’ can be found via the link below:
https://theredbrick.co.uk/2023/01/27/germany-also-not-at-war-with-russia/
Rona, over to you.
Cheers, Ed. So’s not to confuse my name, Rona, with any associated 21st Century ‘scams’ past, future or present, the boys can, if I ever meet any of you fine fellas, call me Frankie. Girls, if you ever meet me, then you too can call me, Frankie.
See above link:
NOTE: From here-on-in all Writing from the Independent article will be highlighted using italics, whereas the golden words for my responses will be silkily written out in bold.
So, no need to weigh up any arguments from the above absolutely ‘unbiased’ opening lines to the Independent’s article as stated by journalist, Hebe Campbell, that is, if you are to accept Hebe’s ‘short and to her point,’ opening statement.
I’m not sure which side of the bed Hebe got out on the day before completing the above introduction, but Candace certainly did take a broadside in the opening volley of her video.
I am wondering if Hebe’s words were only a small exert from an incisive and in-depth piece of investigative journalism by Hebe, which I hope will reflect a well-balanced and impartial journalistic approach to this subject, including examining all the arguments and the evidence, if any. I look forward to it when I see it published.
The question now is, what is the ‘actual’ Independent article going to tell us, so you are all invited including any ‘Conspiracy Theorists’ in the audience to come and join me and read what looks like a very long Independent article. So, everyone with me and to the rabbit hole we go!
Independent: ‘For right-wing firebrand Candace Owens, conspiracy theories are a form of “mind yoga,” a way of bending the mind “like a pretzel.” They’re also extremely compelling, for her millions of social media followers and podcast listeners at least, and extremely lucrative, helping the 36-year-old American build a staggering media empire in under a decade.’
Oh no, does this mean if we listen to Candace we too can be pretzels, personally, they are a bit too salty for me, and they also keep reminding me of all the salty tears the Remoaners shed when the ‘Great British Public’ voted to leave the European Union (EU) ‘cabal-mafiosi,’ which makes me think what are the EU Globizonists puppets dangling around now in front of its EU citizens, which includes the UK citizens too, after all, does anyone really believe the UK left the EU and that the puppets stopped working to undermine BREXIT?
I mean the Anti-Brexiteer Remainers and Politicians, you know, the showery- shite politicians who will in an instance claim ‘Democracy is a Core British Value,’ but only when it suits them.
Yes, those politicians who instead of supporting the democratic will of the people by BREXITING the UK from the European Union, attempted to circumnavigate the 2016 lawful National Referendum, by advocating for a ‘People’s Vote.’
A what!? A ‘Peoples Vote,’ which numpty came up with that blatant attempt to gaslight the public into thinking the referendum was only a ‘dry run,’ a type of ‘mock test’ to see which way the wind was blowing, I mean, looking back at that attempted scam by many of the Swampminster Swampies has me asking myself now in 2025, why did their reaction to BREXIT surprise me, because it wouldn’t now.
Anyways, let us have a peek at what the EU Swampies are up to, surely they have moved on from wanting to send young men and women to what would be their impending doom in a war with Russia, naughty Russia, bad Russia. Aaargh!!!!
Feck me they are still at it and look at them, I doubt whether anyone of this bunch could carry a rifle let alone carry a battle laden ready backpack between them?
Anyways, I digress and now, back to the article in hand….
So, have I misread the opening paragraph of this article or was it an attempt to ‘qualify’ the 73 seconds of input from dear, dear Hebe? Let’s find out shall we….
Independent: ‘Coronavirus and the vaccines. The moon landings. Climate change. The #MeToo case against Harvey Weinstein. Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni’s legal battle. All these disparate subjects have received Owens’ signature treatment. On her eponymous podcast, she [Candace] is the queen of the “just asking questions” approach: positioning herself as an investigating crusader who is bold enough to probe the topics that she believes the mainstream media don’t want you to know about.’
Yes, spot on the Independent, an excellent observation; Candace is the ‘Queen of asking the Questions, that is, asking the questions much of the MSM fail to ask, or if they do ask the ‘real questions’ seeking tangible fact-based answers which will stand up to independent scrutiny, such as the many ‘9/11 and vaccine injury’ questions the public want credible answers to.
For example re 9/11, the questions surrounding where is the ‘indisputable’ evidence that planes crashed into the Pentagon and that United Airlines Flight 93 crashed into a field in Pennsylvania after passengers, ‘apparently,’ fought back against the ‘hijackers’ shortly before it crashed?
Anyways, let us have a look at what Tucker Carlson has to say about this. Uh-oh! Quite a lot of a lot to say, so here is a link to his site and his 5 Youtube videos to get your critical thinking grey cells going through the gears from 1st to 5th. You can shift it up into 6th gear when you begin doing your own research into 9/11:
https://tuckercarlson.com/the911files
You might also want to have a look at this site (link below):
https://www.911research.wtc7.net/disinfo/deceptions/flight93.html
People from around the world have already, with many still joining the cause for ‘9/11 Truth,’ taken an investigative dive into the abyss where the truth is hidden, masked by a blanket of untruths, false narratives and plenty of ‘well dodgy’ other stuff. However, the truth is beginning to surface from what were once ‘rippling’ waters to what are now ‘giant swells.’
The ever-growing numbers of ‘awakening’ citizens from around the world are wanting to know the answers to the unanswered questions, or the questions deliberately omitted and or the answers which will explain the facts, facts not contained within the USA Government sponsored report such as the 9/11 Commission Report, I mean, were two planes the ‘real cause’ behind ‘3’ Buildings falling? Is it any wonder that the report is referred to as the 9/11 ‘Ommission’ Report within the Truthing Community.
If you are playing ‘catch-up’ the ‘free-fall collapse’ of the Twin Towers was joined several hours later before the day’s epilogue , by ‘Building 7, a 47-story skyscraper also within the World Trade Center complex and guess what, Building 7 also collapsed in ‘free-fall,’ apparently, as a result of a fire (per wikipedia). Woh! There’s that word, ‘apparently,’ again!
Did I hear it was because someone forgot to put a cigarette out before discarding it into a bin that caused the fire, or was it a fire caused from burning falling debris from one of the Towers? I can never quite seem to remember which, probably because of the Chemtrails fogging my brain, either way, they both sound a bit ‘fishy’ to me, although I’m somewhat surprised there was not more fires following the explanations given to journos and the public alike surrounding the ‘ins and outs’ of 9/11, with so many politicians and experts speaking deceptively or with ‘forked tongue,’ their pants must have lit up as soon as the opened their mouths (allegedly).
However, one man who does not speak with ‘forked tongue’ is Red Brick ‘Truth Reporter’ Kade Vidic, who has already looked into 9/11 inconsistencies resulting in an article (link below). The next image (8) is a clue as to the conclusion reached by Professor Boffin re the cause of the Twin Towers collapsing.
Our resident Truth Reporter, Kade Vidic, was asked to examine the NIST Report (National Institute of Standards and Technology), which is the report compiled by an apparent ‘independent’ firm,’ selectively chosen by the USA President, George ‘Shoesy’ Bush’s administration.
Kade was asked to see if there were any alternative theories as to what made the Twin Towers collapse on 9/11. Kade recruited our resident scientist and world-renowned expert, Professor ‘Proff’ Boffin, so that they could work together and examine the credibility of the report’s findings. The Proff’s opinions and conclusions have been included within his report.
You can read the full article via the following link:
https://theredbrick.co.uk/2021/08/15/thereal-9-11-villain/
Yes, I know, another digression, sorry. Right, surely the Independent’s article will move on from bringing Candace down and talk about the evidence she [Candace] professes will be produced in court, should it ever get that far, because if the case does get dismissed as Hebe Campbell suggested in her 73 second in depth analysis above, I’ll bet you ‘a pound to a pile of shite’ the whole matter will all disappear into a puff of dust never to be discussed again, at least not by the Macrons and understandably so, too, I mean, best let it go, so least said soonest mended.
Anyways, let’s hear if the Independent’s article will provide us with some of the alleged evidence and or even evidence itself be it circumstantial or real, other than paragraphically constructing repetitive ‘over the top’ and if I might add, tedious mudslinging, so carry on….
Independent: ‘She is part one-woman outrage machine, part millennial version of a medieval mystic; she has certainly worked out how to cleverly monetise the human impulse to “uncover” so-called “truths” and to feel like we are somehow in possession of a secret knowledge that explains how the world works. But her latest forays into so-called “mind yoga” are tying her in ever more complex knots that set her apart from even the most fact-averse of her fellow microphone-toting far-right truthers.’
OK, no change there and definitely nothing much in the way of evidence showing her audience that Candace’s allegations are untrue so, moving on….
Independent: ‘In the summer, French president Emmanuel Macron and his wife Brigitte filed a defamation lawsuit against Owens, who has regularly and fervently ‘spouted bizarre’ claims that the first lady was born male; the couple have accused her of mounting “a campaign of global humiliation” and “relentless bullying on a worldwide scale.” Last month, Owens made the even stranger allegations that the Macrons had attempted to orchestrate her assassination (the National Gendarmerie Intervention Group, the organisation that Owens claimed was involved in the “plot,” told French media that these allegations were fake news).’
Another paragraph and more ‘unbiased opinion’ from the Independent. I’m not getting the impression that this is an article without prejudice and if it is intended not to be, then c’mon man, you should not be using phrases like ‘spouted bizarre,’ I mean, the article is beginning to infer that someone, Candace, is a bit potty, in my humble opinion, of course.
Independent: ‘And in recent weeks, Owens has dragged herself and her followers even further down the rabbit hole by stirring up conspiracies around the death of her one-time boss, Charlie Kirk, the right-wing activist and founder of conservative student group Turning Point, who was shot dead in September. Among her inflammatory claims? The suggestion that his death was somehow an “inside job” involving Turning Point employees.’
Now, now, Independent, and again, double c’mon man, at some point you have got to discuss the evidence both real and circumstantial that Candace has been providing her international audience with since the death of Charlie Kirk. It was not just Candace either, so take a look at the input from ‘The Jimmy Dore Show:
By no means, an exhaustive list. Here are the links to the above shows:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UrhZP266gek
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DRJK1Lg186Q
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OyBgG2veF4Q
Look at how the people and his security detail around him reacted following his death and their failure to preserve the evidence, tampering with the crime scene and removing items, which should have been left for the relevant authorities to recover.
So far and having read the opening paragraphs of the Independent’s article, our metaphorical meaty burger is about as meaty as a ‘veggie burger,’ in fact, veggie burger would be more accurate given that our burger’s only content so far contains a lettuce leaf, a slice of tomato and a shrivelled gherkin.
OK ‘Independent,’ what we demand is some ‘real meat’ from the bones of your article to put in our burger. We’ll keep going so that the millions, billions and trillions of Red Brick ‘carnivoran readership’ will at least be able to add some juicy meat from your article to ‘build a burger.’
Independent: ‘On Wednesday (3rd December 2025), Kirk’s longtime producer Blake Neff finally called Owens out for spending months “attacking Charlie’s closest friends”, who, he said, “have had to endure harassment from people who have gotten whipped up by what Candace is saying”.
Owens is now playing an even higher stakes game, running the risk of finally alienating one-time allies on her end of the political spectrum, while also surely aware that her most devoted core of fans will expect wilder theories to come.’
OK, alienation, I get that, but if you are going to say that, then in the interests of fairness you have got to mention some of the internet’s biggest hitters, broadcasters and journalists, many of whom were either removed, cancelled or jumped the MSM ship because of their personal views.
By no means, an exhaustive list. Here are the links to the above shows:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XnsdpNyULU4&t=243s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TRrUswzhLw0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QJO4OPBhazQ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pPMWacCjRoM&t=513s
However, having jumped the MSM ship many of the independent broadcasters and or journalists to be true to their cause, the pursuit of truth, have since enlisted on ‘The Good Ship Candace (TGS Candace),’ and although their views might not have been as a result of 9/11 opinions, you will find that many of the big hitters having since boarded TGS Candace, have loaded the on-board guns and fired off multi-barrelled ‘uncomfortable truths’ into the public arena, truths based on facts.
Then there are the tangible theories where experts, whose qualifications and experience are impeccable, have dismantled the established facts and or narratives, which they can only take so far without being able to access pertinent information held within government vaults.
Nevertheless, the independent experts have provided the starting blocks for the relevant authoritative bodies to investigate 9/11, properly, to do a real ‘nuts and bolts’ and ‘no stone unturned ‘ job of an investigation into 9/11, that being the event that changed the world and just look at its fall out, hell, it has spread the contents of its nappy (USA diaper) everywhere.
However, more importantly, journalists, broadcasters, filmmakers, experts etc. who exist within the social media but outside of the legacy media, continue to pepper-potting ‘truth bombs’ in the almost forlorn hope that one day the MSM will take up their ‘mantle,’ and by using their [MSM] vast resources take events to the next level.
The links below will show you what I mean and who some of these experts are. These people who are themselves experts in their fields, have clearly stimulated the necessary ‘critical thinking,’ having landed their ‘truth bombs’ smack bang on target, given that there are millions upon millions of people from around the world who follow them. The following sites are not an exhaustive list:
https://www.ae911truth.org (Pilots For 9/11 Truth).
https://pf911t.org (Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth).
https://www.911firefighters.org (Firefighters for 9/11 Truth | Official Site).
The MSM, despite their ‘selective reporting’ have been receiving direct hits to their ‘Golden Dome,’ which is sponsored by the Globizonists and despite the dome still holding firm, the cracks are beginning to show, because who would have thought that we would know the amount of information re Epstein Island and his ‘Epstillian Empire,’ much of which has been as a result of public pressure forcing the hand of the USA Government to release information, following their initial claim that there was ‘nothing to see here.’
It is almost as if the MSM had to reluctantly report on the Epstein Files, although from my research the MSM ‘effort’ has fallen well short of any ‘lip service,’ therefore my view is that the MSM have ‘done a shit job,’ in my opinion, of course. Oops, digression again, so back to the Independent’s article….
Independent: ‘Owens has built a staggering media empire over the course of just a few years. Owens has built a staggering media empire over the course of just a few years. So how did Owens become one of the most influential – and arguably, one of the most dangerous – woman on the internet?’
‘Her early days didn’t exactly lay obvious foundations for a hard-right pivot. The third of four children, she spent her childhood in Stamford, Connecticut and, following her parents’ divorce, was brought up by her grandparents. At school, she experienced racist bullying; when she was in her senior year, she received death threats from some white classmates, including the son of Stamford’s then-mayor. Her family sued the Stamford Board of Education, eventually gaining a $37,500 settlement.’
Wow! I read the last paragraph and all I see is a person, Candace, determined to be successful and stand up to bullies. Seems we haven’t moved on from putting Candace down, and despite the attacks. So far she has been an immoveable object.
However, will Candace be able to keep ‘bobbing and weaving’ in this article or will the Independent ‘slam-dunk’ her onto the canvass and begin the count 10….9….8….
Independent: ‘Around this time, she developed “an abiding interest in current affairs,” as a Tatler profile would later put it, with her political sympathies initially skewing towards the Democrats. After dropping out of a journalism degree at the University of Rhode Island, Owens interned in the fashion cupboard at America Vogue (“There was not some kind of formal hierarchy, but it was very clear that she was running the show,” a fellow intern recalled in Vanity Fair).’
No slam dunk and Candace was back on her feet having taken a quick power nap mistaken for a fall, however, the article narrative has Candace back on the ropes again, although from the repetitive content of this Independent article, it does look to me that the article is tiring, with the last paragraph looking to me like a rehash of previous ones.
Independent: ‘She then worked her way up the ranks in administration in a New York private equity firm, before co-founding a marketing agency. Dig back into the agency’s blog archives and you will find Owens mouthing off about “the bat-s**t-crazy antics of the Republican Tea Party.” But her politics would soon change drastically. In 2016, she launched a Kickstarter campaign for a platform called Social Autopsy, a searchable database of internet trolls (there is, of course, a certain irony to Owens initially touting herself as some kind of anti-cyber bullying champion). She is part one-woman outrage machine, part millennial version of a medieval mystic.’
So far, it looks like Candace Owens is being painted as a confused person by the author and that is putting it mildly or politely, or mildly polite, if that is the intention and it is my belief that it is, well it aint working on me, nor will it be working on the growing millions upon millions of critical thinkers, thinkers who thirst for truth and knowledge grows not just with each passing day, but with each passing minute.
However, there is plenty time left in this article to do a bit of levelling up and show us some of the evidence that Candace alludes to and not just the evidence she has published, but also the Independent’s rebuttal evidence showing Candace is wrong, and not just constantly ‘disssing her.’
Independent: ‘Inevitably, it stoked criticism: wouldn’t this just amount to doxxing, the typically malicious act of posting another person’s private details on the internet? Owens ended up on the receiving end of online hate herself, and blamed left-wing activists. “I became a conservative overnight,” she later reflected. “I realised that liberals were actually the racists. Liberals were actually the trolls.’
‘Not long after, she started posting on YouTube: her first video was a sketch in which she “came out” to her parents as a conservative. Owens positioned herself as a supporter of Trump, who was then in the early stages of his first presidency, and decried ideas around identity politics, structural racism and the Black Lives Matter movement. She particularly vehemently opposed any suggestion that African Americans should perceive themselves as victims – and still does.
OK, so Candace has an opinion re Black Lives Matter and African Americans Victimhood, well, so what?! Big Deal! I can see where Candace is coming from in a sense, telling people to move on from events and experiences that occurred long before they were born, although just like Candace, everyone has their right to an opinion.
This did have me thinking about the millions of Britons during the last Millenium who were forcibly thrown into wars only to die for or on behalf of the Establishment Elites, wars arguably nothing to do with the UK and were, again, arguably, manufactured through false narratives and or provocations.
I can’t see the Royal Family or the other lineages both royal and ‘empire throwbacks’ who plundered from then ‘undeveloped’ nations unable to defend themselves from the tyranny of the then ‘superpowers,’ who divvied up their ‘plundered loot’ through the ‘bullying’ of Empire, so for us ‘useless eaters’ who lost family through their pointless wars and or ‘Empire Building,’ if the past is holding you back, then you might want to consider taking a leaf out of Candace’s book and move on….and upwards!
During the first World War whilst military ‘establishment figures were silver-servicing it behind enemy lines,’ they were ordering young British fighting men under their charge out of the trenches and ‘over the top’ to march towards the enemy machine guns, only to be cut down in what should have been the ‘prime of their lives;’ it was nothing less than murder in my opinion and not just mine, because that is also the opinion of someone who was there:
I believe that is what Candace’s message is: Move and don’t let the past hold you back, lift yourself up and stop wallowing in not only your own, but also the victimhood of your forebears?
If you want to know more you should check out the many videos Candace has on her Youtube channel re BLEXIT (images below not exhaustive). I have provided 2 links (1) Candace’s many videos re BLEXIT and (2) a generic link for all the videos she has produced:
And there you go, otherwise I will keep repeating myself as I slalom my way through the paragraphs looking for the ‘meat,’ so enough is enough and anyways, I’m beginning to feel tired and it’s time for my afternoon nap.
The rest of the article can be read by following its link at the top of the page under the title image.
In my opinion a similar thread continues throughout the article and whereas the opinions and presuppositions in the article can be transferred to the reader either knowingly or unwittingly, the reader at least should be provided with three hundred and sixty degrees of context and or information to do their own research.
That said, the reader also has to take some responsibility in this context, being open-minded enough to challenge the written word and think things through critically, especially when someone’s reputation is being discussed, however, when the author is asking someone to read their article, in this case a newspaper, then the publishing news agency does, in my opinion, have a responsibility to provide that context even when the article’s author does not.
Nevertheless all that said I have reached my conclusion re the Independent’s article, which for me can be best described through a Red Brick ‘Meme.’
In the second article we will have another look at Candace Owens and how she has dealt with people who have misrepresented her words and comments.
Rona Francks, Red Brick Political Satirist and Comedy Critic for the Red Brick International Media News Group.